top of page

Blocking: Monocyte block

Updated: Oct 12, 2024

Today's post might be controversial. I welcome you to test the findings yourself. I have only used the BioLegend Monocyte Blocker and CellBlox, not BD MonoBlock.


The issue

Cyanine-tandem dye binding to monocytes and macrophages. This paper by Kristensen et al. nicely demonstrates the issue.


The reagent


What is it?

Probably DNA. This paper, which first formally describes the effect, demonstrates that phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides can block non-specific binding of Cy5 tandems to myeloid cells.


Alternatives

Mouse or human serum, but not commercial Fc Block, can accomplish similar effects, in my experience. This goes against the published literature.


What it’s supposed to do

Prevent/reduce binding of tandem fluorophores to monocytes. This is a definite issue for people working with human PBMCs.


Examples

I have trouble getting any beneficial effect on mouse cells, so here's an example using a PE-tandem on human CD14+ monocytes with surface staining:


Yes, it works. It doesn't completely block the non-specific binding, and the Fc blocking reagents perform better.


Here are some examples on human monocytes with overnight intracellular staining at too high a concentration of anti-CCR7:

Again, it works, but so do the Fc blocks. Monocyte blockers reduce non-specific binding of many conjugates, not just obviously cyanine-based tandems. In some cases this may be due to the incorporation of cyanine dyes as acceptor groups in the modern fluorophores (e.g., Brilliant dyes).


Any detrimental effects?

Oh yes! Very much so.


Naked DNA is not good for cells. In fact, neutrophils use it to capture and kill invading microbes. If you've ever isolated cells from tissues, you've probably used DNAse to reduce clumping, improve viability and improve yields. A lot of protocols use DNAse for cryopreserved PBMC thawing (it helps).


If you use Monocyte Blocker, the cells are much more likely to clump up, giving you fewer cells to work with.

Live leukocyte recovery with freshly isolated mouse splenocytes and cryopreserved human PBMCs (technical replicates). Data expressed as percent recovery, using the average recovery in FACS buffer (PBS 2.5% FCS 2mm EDTA) as the baseline.


Monocyte Blocker is not really any worse than CellBlox (if anything, the reverse). The difference is that Monocyte Blocker is being added as a pre-block while CellBlox (following the manufacturer's recommendation) is being added with the staining mix. Longer incubations give lower recovery. Generally, the effect manifests as an invisible loss of cells rather than a visible increase in dead cells; the loss tends to be higher among lymphocytes, skewing the cellular composition slightly.


Okay, so it's not great to use this on live cells. What about on fixed cells? Well, that gets rid of the problems of cell loss/killing, but we have a new issue.


When used intracellularly, Monocyte Block reduces transcription factor staining.


Examples with human PBMCs (overnight intracellular staining):


Examples with mouse splenocytes (overnight intracellular staining):




As far as I'm aware, this is a previously unknown effect.

Why is this happening? I don't know. I see two possibilities, assuming this is DNA-based: 1) Monocyte Block's DNA binds to histones, obscuring transcription factors that are bound to the cellular DNA. 2) Monocyte Block's DNA displaces cellular DNA in the transcription factor binding site, causing the transcription factor proteins to be released and float out of the cell--this is far-fetched because it would require a very broad set of DNA sequences (random oligos) in Monocyte block in order to displace disparate transcription factors.


How much to use?

The manufacturer-recommended test is 5ul per sample. The effects are concentration-dependent, and beneficial and detrimental aspects go hand-in-hand. To achieve complete blocking, you'll likely need 10-20ul per sample.


When do you really need it?

Well, as mentioned above, there is a beneficial effect with human monocytes. Perhaps if you're working exclusively on human monocytes and don't care about the lymphocytes?


Bottom line/how to get the best results

Don't use it? You can block non-specific binding of tandems to monocytes using serum (mouse, human, rat) and by titrating, in most cases.


If you do use it, minimize the time it's in contact with your cells. Add it to your staining mix rather than pre-blocking. CellBlox in particularly is suggested to be used in this manner to prevent the loss of cell viability/integrity. As I've communicated to the manufacturer, this doesn't entirely fix the problem.


Reagents used:

5 Comments


Is fetal bovine serum just as good as mouse serum? I always have fetal bovine serum on hand, so that would be more convenient for me than buying mouse serum. What concentration are you using? This is a great body of work that should be published and made into common knowledge. This is especially relevant now that so many dyes are tandems but not named in an obvious way, BV605, etc., (as you mentioned) and suggests that we need to always include serum. I have some unexpected transcription factor data that I need to go repeat without monocyte block.

Like
olivertburton
olivertburton
13 minutes ago
Replying to

No, it's not. I always include FBS in my FACS buffer at 2.5%. FBS doesn't work for specific Fc blocking for a couple of reasons: 1) FBS is used in part because it has very low IgG levels and 2) bovine antibodies don't bind well to mouse or human Fc receptors.


I'm using 1-5% mouse serum (usually 2-3%), depending a bit on how sticky the particular assay is. Purified mouse IgG may work in many cases, if you prefer something cleaner, but that's usually more expensive and tends to be less effective.


I'm glad you've found it useful. This should be published fairly soon in Current Protocols in Cytometry (currently under review).

Like

Guest
Dec 09, 2024

Or the root of the problem is simply CD64 again... https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V88.6.2358.bloodjournal8862358


Which would also explain why BD Mouse Fc Block (a-CD16/32) doesn't work very well but Human Fc Block (recombinant Fc proteins) and various IgG sera do.

Like

Guest
Jul 29, 2024

Does this indicates relying on Mouse and Rat serum is the best way forward? Most likely much cheaper option.

Like
olivertburton
olivertburton
Sep 01, 2024
Replying to

Sorry, I must have turned off notifications for this.

Yes, I think so. There are a few cases where adding the commercial Fc block can add some benefit, but probably just using a higher concentration of mouse serum would do the trick.

Like
bottom of page